🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.